
K-pop Organizations Demand Anti-Tampering Law as NewJeans-Hybe Contract Dispute Intensifies
Korean music industry organizations are calling for new anti-tampering legislation amid the ongoing NewJeans (now NJZ) and Hybe contract dispute. This development highlights growing concerns about contract stability in K-pop.

K-pop group NewJeans in promotional photo
Five major Korean music organizations, including the Korea Management Federation and Recording Industry Association of Korea, have united to address what they call a threat to the industry's foundation. Their primary concern stems from NewJeans' recent contract termination with Hybe-owned Ador and subsequent rebranding as NJZ.
The dispute began when NewJeans moved to terminate their contract with Ador, leading to an impending court case scheduled for March 7th. Despite ongoing legal challenges, the group has:
- Rebranded as NJZ
- Secured a Calvin Klein partnership
- Announced upcoming performances
- Planned new music releases
Industry organizations argue that allowing unilateral contract terminations could destabilize K-pop's established business model, which relies on long-term artist development and exclusive contracts. They're pushing for legislation to protect these agreements while discouraging public disputes through media campaigns and political appearances.
The situation has escalated with:
- NJZ members' parents managing PR through Instagram
- Allegations against Hybe's Bang Si-Hyuk regarding show cancellations
- Ador's insistence on using the group's "official" name
- Debate over the proposed anti-tampering law
This controversy represents a crucial moment for K-pop, challenging traditional industry practices and raising questions about artist rights versus agency control.

Alabama June Jam festival logo

Benson Boone holding trophy award
Related Articles

Heated Ador vs NewJeans Legal Battle Intensifies: April Court Date Set After Tense Injunction Hearing
