Thomson Reuters has won a significant fair use victory in an AI copyright infringement case against Ross Intelligence, setting a potential precedent for future AI-related copyright disputes.

The case revolves around Ross Intelligence's alleged unauthorized use of Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal database content to create an AI-powered law search engine. Judge Stephanos Bibas ruled that Thomson Reuters' headnotes constitute original, copyrightable work, comparing the editorial process to sculpture creation.

Key Findings:

• The court found Ross's use of protected materials non-transformative
• Judge Bibas identified actual copying in 2,243 of 2,830 examined headnotes
• The ruling specifically addresses non-generative AI, not generative AI applications

The judge emphasized that Ross aimed to create a market substitute for Westlaw, which significantly influenced the fair use determination. However, the ruling's impact on broader AI copyright cases may be limited since it specifically addresses non-generative AI.

While this victory strengthens copyright holders' positions, its application to generative AI cases remains uncertain. The court noted that generative AI's consumption of copyrighted media presents distinct challenges not addressed in this ruling.

The case highlights the ongoing tension between AI development and copyright protection, particularly relevant for industries like music where generative AI models use protected content to create derivative works.

This ruling could influence future cases involving AI and copyright infringement, though its scope primarily affects traditional data usage rather than generative AI applications.

Related Articles

Previous Articles