Major music industry leaders are strongly opposing the UK government's proposed AI training framework that would allow AI companies to train on copyrighted works without explicit permission. The proposal requires rightsholders to opt out rather than opt in.

Universal Music's Lucian Grainge, Sony Music's Rob Stringer, and Warner Music's Robert Kyncl have voiced serious concerns about this controversial measure. They argue it would significantly compromise intellectual property rights and music monetization opportunities.

Key objections from industry leaders:

• Lucian Grainge (Universal): The UK is at a "decisive crossroads" regarding IP protection
• Robert Kyncl (Warner): The proposal would be "very detrimental" to the music industry
• Rob Stringer (Sony): Creators must be fairly compensated for AI use of their work
• Gee Davy (AIM): The exception would create "a race to the bottom" and burden smaller players

The industry is advocating for:

• Automatic training safeguards for creators instead of an opt-out system
• Amendments to the UK's Data Bill to strengthen copyright protections
• Fair compensation frameworks for AI usage of creative works

The proposal aims to attract AI investment to the UK amid strict EU regulations. However, critics, including Paul McCartney and Elton John, argue it sacrifices creator rights for corporate interests.

Similar debates continue in the United States, particularly regarding fair use in AI applications and the balance between technological advancement and creative rights protection.

Related Articles

Previous Articles